Evaluasi Penilaian Proses Menggunakan Model Alkin  pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika SMAN Se-Gorontalo

Fira Lakoro; Masri Kuadrat Umar; Dewa Gede Eka Setiawan

doi:10.32884/ideas.v9i1.1189

Fira Lakoro Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Masri Kuadrat Umar Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Dewa Gede Eka Setiawan Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v9i1.1189

Abstract

This study was conducted to know the level activity of physics teachers in making preparations, planning, implementation until reporting learning outcomes in one year. This study aims to determine the evaluation process in physics subjects in State Junior High Schol throughout Gorontalo Province with the Alkin model approach. The method used in research was quantitative method. The results of the study were obtained based on questionnaire that containing questions regarding the evaluation of the assessment process carried out by physics teachers in Gorontalo Province. The results showed that the evaluation process of assessment in Gorontalo Province was included in the very good category or above 81%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andriani, S. (2015). Evaluasi CSE-UCLA pada Studi Proses Pembelajaran Matematika Siska Andriani. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 167–175.
Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Sumaryanti, S. (2018). Sikap Siswa terhadap Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN Kabupaten Batanghari. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 3(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.26737/jip f.v3i2.694
Darodjat, D., & M, W. (2015). Model Evaluasi Program. Islamadina, Volume XIV(1), 1–28.
Devi, M. Y., Fitria, Y., & Padang, U. N. (2022). Model-Model Evaluasi Pendidikan dan Model Sepuluh Langkah dalam Penilaian. JURNALBASICEDU, 6(1), 675–683.
Evi, A., Nurfathanah, S., Arafah, K., & Arsyad, M. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Fisika SMA Negeri di Kota Makassar dalam Mengimplementasikan Kurikulum 2013. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika PPs UNM Rencana, 2.
Fitria Zahra Rizqie Arini, D. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Proses untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Sains dan Aktivitas Siswa SMP. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(2), 177.
Hamdi, M. M. (2020). Evalusi Kurikulum Pendidikan. Intizam, Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 66–75. http://ejournal.staida-krempyang.ac.id/index.php/intizam/article/view/248
Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP. Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan”. At, 6(1), 23.
Munthe, A. P. (2015). Pentingya Evaluasi Program di Institusi Pendidikan: Sebuah Pengantar, Pengertian, Tujuan dan Manfaat. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 5(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.s cholaria.2015.v5.i2.p1-14
Muryadi, A. D. (2017). Model Evaluasi Program dalam Penelitian Evaluasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penjas, 3(1), 1–16.
Risdoyok. (2021). Model Evaluasi CIPP dalam Mengevaluasi Program Tahfiz Selama Daring di SMP Islam Al-Ishlah Bukittingg. 73–82. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v7i3.429
Rukajat, A. (2008). Manajemen Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Sesmiarni, Z. (2013). Model Evaluasi. Bukittinggi-Aura Printing & Publishing.
Syarifuddin, M. &. (2018). Model-Model Evaluasi Pendidikan. Mitra Ash-Shibyan Jurnal Pendidikan & Konseling, 02.
Widiyanto, D., & Istiqomah, A. (2020). Evaluasi Penilaian Proses dan Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran PPKn. Jurnal Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan.