Penyelesaian Sengketa terhadap Hak Paten yang Tidak Memiliki Unsur Kebaharuan di Indonesia
Abstract
Article 4 letter f of Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents determines that an invention cannot be granted for a previously existing discovery that does not contain elements of novelty and is also a product known to the wider community, so it should not be can be given a Patent Certificate to protect the rights of the valid Patent holder. Settlement of disputes over registered patents that do not have an element of novelty (lack of novelty) can be filed with the competent authority, namely the Commercial Court in the local legal area of domicile. Novelty or in Indonesian an element of novelty in an invention is a necessity for the invention. The terms Novelty and Anticipation can replace each other in usage. as an anticipation for an invention, in a prior art or step of the invention it must contain something regarding product disclosure (which can be implemented) or if the invention is in the case of a process patent it is required to provide clear directions and cannot be mistaken in carrying out the results an invention that has been carried out by an inventor.
Downloads
References
Patent Act 1977 (PA 1977), s.2(2) defines the state of the art as comprising all matter made available to the public before the priority date of the invention (the priority date is the date of the first patent application).
World Intellectual Property Organization, (2010), Learn from the past, create the future: INVENTIONS AND PATENTS, WIPO Publication No.925E.
Imam Taufik, (2018) Relasi Negara dan Masyarakat dalam Diskursus Sengleta di Indonesia dalam Mengelola Sengketa Damai Teori, Strategis dan Implementasi Resolusi Sengketa, Walisongo Mediation Center, Semarang,
Laura Nader, (1978) The Disputing Process Law in Ten Societies, Columbia University Press, New York.
Hj.Endang Purwaningsih, (2015) Hukum Paten, CV Mandar Maju, Bandung.
T. Mulya Lubis, (2015), Undang-Undang Paten, PT. Gramedia, Jakarta, 2005.
Sunggono, B, (2003), Metode Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
M. Yahya Harahap (1997) Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa, P.T. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Suyud Margono dan Amir Angkasa, (2003) Komersialisasi Aset Intelektual Aspek Hukum Bisnis, Grasindo, Jakarta.
Rahmi Jened Parinduri Nasution, (2013), Interface Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual dan Hukum Persaingan (Penyalahgunaan HKI), Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wirjono Projodikoro, (1952), Hukum Perdata tentang Hak-Hak atas Benda, PT. Pembimbing Masa,Jakarta.
Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, (1983), Mencari Sistem Hukum Benda Nasional, P.T Alumni, Bandung.
Rachmadi Usman, (2003), Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Bandung, PT. Itra Aditya Bakti.
O.K. Saidin, (1995), Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Penerbit Raja Grafindo Persada.
Adami Chazawi, (2007), Tindak Pidana HAKI, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang.
Rachmadi Usman, (2003), Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Perlindungan dan Dimensi Hukumnya di Indonesia, Alumni, Bandung.
Dean G. Pruitt dan Jeffrey Z. Rubin, (2004), Konflik Sosial, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Sudargo Gautama, (1995), Segi-segi Hukum Hak Milik Intelektual, Penerbit Eresco, Bandung
Nurnaningsih Amriani, (2011), Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Suyud Margono, (2000),Alternative Dispute Resulution dan Arbitrase, Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia.
Caroline Wilson, (2002) Nutshells: Intellectual Property Law, Sweet&Maxwell, London.
H. Salim HS dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani, (2017), Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian dan Disertasi, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Muhamad Djumhana, R.Djubaedillah, (2003), Hak Milik Intelektual: Sejarah, Teori, dan Prakteknya di Indonesia, Cetakan ketiga, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Achmad Zen Umar Purba, (2005), Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pasca TRIPs, Bandung, Alumni.
