Students’ Perspectives Toward Grammar Teaching Methods in English Language Education Study Program

  • Fifi Novriana Suradin Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Sri Widyarti Ali Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Indri Wirahmi Bay Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to elucidate students' perspectives on grammar teaching methods. It observed 5th-semester students from the 2019 academic year, in English Language Education Study Program. Five students were chosen at random from each class, so the total sample for this study was 25. The descriptive quantitative research method was applied to this study. The information was gathered using a questionnaire that represented two grammar teaching methods: explicit and implicit. Each one consists of six statements, with several options for students to choose from, including strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree. The findings revealed that each student has a different perspective on what method is required. The questionnaire results showed that approximately 80% of students agreed with every statement in the explicit method, and the majority of them chose neutral to the statements in the implicit method, with an average percentage of 37%-70%. As a result, students can be taught using both implicit and explicit methods, as both have advantages, and it is determined by the needs of each student.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altun., &. Dincer. (2020). A Comparison of Implicit and Explicit Teaching in Terms of Grammar Writing Skills of Intermediate Learners. . Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, , 9(1), 96-105.
Aqel, M. I. (2013). The Effect of Using Grammar-Translation Method on Acquiring English as Foreign Language. International Journal of Asian Social Science. Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts, Mutah University.
Arifatin, F. W. (2022). A Narrative Inquiry Study on Language Learning Through Pop-Up Book. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, 1022.
Braun, V. C. (2016). Using Thematic Analysis in Sport and Exercise Research. In B. Smith, & A. C. Sparkes (Eds.), . London: Routlegde.
Bungin, B. (2005). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta : Prenadamedia.
Chodija., N. &. (2017). Teaching the Simple Past Tense through Explicit instruction and Implicit Instruction. . FKIP Universitas Lampung,.
Dincer, A. &. (2020). A Comparison of Implicit and Explicit Teaching in Terms of Grammar Writing Skills of Intermediate Learners. Journal of Faculty of Education, 96-105.
Ibrahim, N. ( 2016). Games For Teaching Grammar To Young Learners. . Riau: Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim of Riau.
Khodaeian., R. &. (2021). The Effects of Explicit vs. Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners' Acquisition of English Definite and Indefinite Articles. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research - Volume 9, Issue 35, Spring 2021, 2.
Lugoloobi-nalunga, M. (2017). Teaching English grammar.
Mart, T. C. (2013). Teaching Grammar in Context: Why and How? . Department of Langauges. Erbil : Ishik University.: ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland.
Pazaver A., W. H. (2009). Asian Students’’ Perceptions of Grammar Teaching in the ESL Classroom. . Sweden, Canada. : World Maritime University, Mount Saint Vincent University.
Resseffendi. (2010). Metode Penelitian. . NASPA Journal, 33, 26–36.
Sudjana, N. (2005). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdikarya.
Published
2022-11-11
How to Cite
SURADIN, Fifi Novriana; ALI, Sri Widyarti; BAY, Indri Wirahmi. Students’ Perspectives Toward Grammar Teaching Methods in English Language Education Study Program. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 4, p. 1299-1304, nov. 2022. ISSN 2656-940X. Available at: <https://jurnal.ideaspublishing.co.id/index.php/ideas/article/view/1050>. Date accessed: 03 dec. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v8i4.1050.