An Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Learning TOEFL at Seventh Semester of Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar

  • Herman Herman Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar
  • Dumaris E Silalahi Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar
  • Yanti Kristina Sinaga Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar
  • Gabriella Clarisa Silaban Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the students’ difficulties in conducting the TOEFL test in the skill of structure and written expressions. Descriptive qualitative was implemented in this research with students of the seventh semester of English Department of Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar as the data. The result was the most difficult skills faced by the students were skill 25, it was the use parallel structure with paired conjunction, with only 3 students. Some factors causing the skill to be the most difficult was students lost their focus in managing time and they were lack of knowledge and training in practising the section of structure (grammar).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Destiyanti, C., Amin, M., & Putera, L. J. (2021). Gender-Based Analysis of Students’ Ability in Answering Factual and Vocabulary-in-Context Questions of The TOEFL-Like Reading Comprehension Test. Palapa: Jurnal Studi Keislaman dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v9i1.926
Etika, I. (2020). Investigating The Difficulties Faced by English Department Students in Structure and Written Expression Section of TOEFL at Bung Hatta University. LINGUA LITERA: Journal of English Linguistics and Literature, 5(1), 42–69. https://doi.org/10.5 5345/stba1.v5i1.46
Fitria, T. N. (2021). An Analysis of the Students’ Difficulties in TOEFL Prediction Test of Listening Section. ENGLISH FRANCA: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 5(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v5i1.2212
Fitria, T. N., & Prastiwi, I. E. (2020). Pelatihan Tes TOEFL (Test of English Foreign Language) untuk Siswa SMK/SMA, Mahasiswa, Dosen, dan Umum. Jurnal Budimas, 02(02), 173–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/budimas.v2i2.1457
Fleckenstein, J., Keller, S., Krüger, M., Tannenbaum, R. J., & Köller, O. (2020). Linking TOEFL iBT® Writing Rubrics to CEFR Levels: Cut Scores and Validity Evidence from a Standard Setting Study. Assessing Writing, 43(July 2019), 100420. https://doi.org/10.1 016/j.asw.2019.100420
Hampp, P. L., Kumayas, T. A., & Lengkoan, F. (2021). Synthesizing Grammar and Structure Problems Faced by Indonesian TOEFL Participants. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 9(1), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v9i1.33811
Hidri, S., & Pileh Roud, L. F. (2020). Developing and Using Hints in Computerized Dynamic Assessment of a TOEFL iBT Reading Exam. Heliyon, 6(9), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.heliyon.2020.e04985
Kim, E.-Y. J. (2017). The TOEFL iBT Writing: Korean Students’ Perceptions of The TOEFL iBT Writing Test. Assessing Writing, 77(July 2017), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw. 2017.02.001
Ling, G. (2017). Are TOEFL iBT® Writing Test Scores Related to Keyboard Type? A survey of Keyboard-Related Practices at testing Centers. Assessing Writing, 31(January 2017), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.04.001
Llosa, L., & Malone, M. E. (2017). Student and Instructor Perceptions of Writing Tasks and Performance on TOEFL iBT Versus University Writing Courses. Assessing Writing, 34, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.09.004
Masfufah, S. (2018). Indonesian College Students’ Perceptions of TOEFL Preparation Class. EduLite Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, 3(1), 66–78. https://doi.or g/10.30659/e.3.1.66-78
Sari, Y. A., Suhono, S., Latief, S., & Al Faruq Hasyim, U. A. (2021). Investigasi Kesulitan Mahasiswa pada Structure and Written Expression Section of TOEFL di Perguruan Tinggi Kota Metro. Curricula: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 33–69. https://doi.org/1 0.22216/jcc.2021.v6i1.122
Slamet, J., & Sulistyaningsih, S. (2021). Students’ Difficulties in Answering “Structure and Written Expression” TOEFL-Like at STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo. E-Structural, 4(01), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.33633/es.v4i01.4410
Soali, M., & Pujiani, T. (2021). An Error Analysis of Non-English Students Department in Answering Listening Section in TOEFL. J-LEE - Journal of Law, English, and Economics, 2(01), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.35960/j-lee.v2i01.593
Stirling, B. (2017). TOEFL Strategies: A Complete Guide to The iBT. Nova Press.
Ubaedillah. (2020). Structure and Written Expression Section on Paper-Based TOEFL: Perceived Difficulties by Managements’ Students of Universitas Muhadi Setiabudi. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 8(1), 1–18. https://journal.peradaban.ac.id/index.php/jdpbi/a rticle/view/536
Yabie, H. S., Husain, N., & Badu, H. (2021). The Implementation of 2013 Curriculum Learning Models Based on English Teachers’ Experience at SMP Negeri 4 Gorontalo. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, 7(3), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v7i4.513
Published
2023-08-28
How to Cite
HERMAN, Herman et al. An Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Learning TOEFL at Seventh Semester of Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 3, p. 805-812, aug. 2023. ISSN 2656-940X. Available at: <https://jurnal.ideaspublishing.co.id/index.php/ideas/article/view/1391>. Date accessed: 15 may 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v9i3.1391.