Rethinking Blindness and Femininity Through Feminist Disability  in All The Light We Can Not See by Anthony Doerr

Agry Pramita

doi:10.32884/ideas.v11i4.2387

Agry Pramita Universitas Islam Sunan Gunung Djati

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v11i4.2387

Abstract

This study examines Anthony Doerr’s All the Light We Cannot See through the lens of feminist disability theory, particularly the works of Rosemarie Garland- Thomson. It aims to explore how blindness and femininity are portrayed not as deficits, but as alternative forms of knowledge, agency, and resistance. The analysis centers on the character of Marie-Laure LeBlanc, a blind young girl whose heightened sensory perception, emotional strength, and quiet resilience defy traditional stereotypes of disability and female passivity. Employing a qualitative research method based on library research and textual analysis, the study investigates how Doerr’s narrative construction of Marie-Laure challenges dominant visual norms, narrative, and patriarchal representations. Key findings highlight blindness as a valid and complex way of knowing, the politics of visibility and invisibility, and the role of social context and support systems in shaping disabled subjectivity. The study concludes that All the Light We Cannot See contributes to a broader literary and cultural recognition of disability and femininity as meaningful, dignified, and agentive states of being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belsey, C. (2005). Textual analysis as a research method. In G. Griffin (Ed.), Researchmethods for English studies (pp. 157–174). Edinburgh University Press.
Clare, E. (2017). Brilliant imperfection: Grappling with cure. Duke University Press.
Doerr, A. (2014). All the Light We Cannot See. Scribner. 
Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). University of Minnesota Press. 
Erevelles, N. (2011). Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. Palgrave Macmillan. 
Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1988.tb02045.x 
Garland-Thomson, R. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. Columbia University Press. 
George, M. W. (2008). The elements of library research: What every student needs to know. Princeton University Press. 
Hall, K. Q. (2011). Feminist disability studies. Indiana University Press. 
Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York University Press.
Meekosha, H. (2006). What the hell are you? An intercultural analysis of disability and gender in the Global South. Disability & Society, 21(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590500498051
Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (2000). Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. University of Michigan Press.
Schalk, S. (2018). Bodyminds reimagined: (Dis)ability, race, and gender in Black women’ speculative fiction. Duke University Press. 
Thomson, R. G. (Ed.). (1996). Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body. New York University Press. 
Titchkosky, T. (2007). Reading and writing disability differently: The textured life of embodiment. University of Toronto Press. 
Young, I. M. (2005). On female body experience: “Throwing like a girl” and other essays. Oxford University Press. 
Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. Routledge.