Dinamika Kewarganegaraan Liberal: Tantangan Global dan Masa Depan Hak Asasi Manusia
Abstract
In the context of the era of globalization, liberal citizenship has become a major focus, influencing global politics and human rights. This research explores the role of the state, citizen participation, and the protection of individual rights, identifying obstacles to the implementation of the concept of liberal citizenship. Through content analysis methods and literature meta-analysis, this research explains the dynamics of liberal citizenship with a focus on Indonesia, revealing the complexity of the relationship between individual freedom and state responsibility. The research findings highlight political, cultural, and economic barriers to achieving ideal liberal citizenship. The implications show the need for careful regulations regarding technology adoption, improving law enforcement, and protecting human rights to create an inclusive and responsive society to global change.
Downloads
References
Bianchi, R., & Stephenson, M. (2014). Tourism and Citizenship: Rights, Freedoms and Responsibilities in The Global Order. Routledge.
Bourchier, D. M. (2019). Two Decades of Ideological Contestation in Indonesia: From Democratic Cosmopolitanism to Religious Nationalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(5), 713–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1590620
Chen, Y. J. (2021). Authoritarian International Law" in Action? Tribal Politics in The Human Rights Council. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 54(5), 1203-1255. https://ssrn .com/abstract=4019964
Davies, M. (2014). An Agreement to Disagree: The ASEAN Human Rights Declaration and The Absence of Regional Identity in Southeast Asia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 33(3), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341403300305
Dewanto, R., Ramadhan, A. R., Firdaus, F. F., Mozrapa, E. S., & Hidayat, T. (2023). Menumbuhkan Sikap Karakter Kebangsaan Melalui Pendidikan Sejarah pada Era Disrupsi Abad-21. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, 9(2), 343-350. https://doi.org/1 0.32884/ ideas.v9i2.1307
Fariss, C. J. (2014). Respect for Human Rights Has Improved Over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability. American Political Science Review, 108(2), 297–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000070
Fraser, J. (2019). Challenging State-Centricity and legalism: Promoting The Role of social Institutions in The Domestic Implementation of International Human Rights Law. International Journal of Human Rights, 23(6), 974–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364298 7.2019.1577539
Guinto, R. L. L. R., Curran, U. Z., Suphanchaimat, R., & Pocock, N. S. (2015). Universal health Coverage in “One ASEAN”: Are Migrants Included? Global Health Action, 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.25749
Kabwete, C. M. (2018). Towards Justice and Reconciliation in Post-Conflict Countries: Meaningful Concepts and Possible Realities. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 18(1), 65–91. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajcr/article/view/175830
Locke, J. (1993). Two Treatises Of Government. New Edition.
Malik, F., Abduladjid, S., Sudika Mangku, D. G., Rai Yuliartini, N. P., Suta Wirawan, I. G. M. A., & Angga Mahendra, P. R. (2021). Legal Protection for People with Disabilities in The Perspective of Human Rights in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 538–547. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ulj/article/download/52 406/23162/
McGregor, L., Murray, D., & Ng, V. (2019). International Human Rights Law as A Framework for Algorithmic Accountability. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(2), 309–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000046
Mutua, M. W. (2017). The Ideology of Human Rights. In International Law of Human Rights. Routledge.
Nursanti, N. N. P., Handayani, H., Paramita, C., Tofanie, S., & Ramadhan, A. R. (2023). Urgensi Pendidikan Karakter dalam Membentuk Digital Citizenship yang Kritis. Educatio, 18(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.29408/edc.v18i1.14054
Ochoa-Sánchez, J. C. (2019). Economic and Social Rights and Truth Commissions. The International Journal of Human Rights, 23(9), 1470–1493. https://doi/org/10.1080/13642 987.2019.1613380
Oudejans, N. (2014). The Right to Have Rights as The Right to Asylum. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 1, 7-26. https://doi.org/10.5553/NJLP/221307132014043001002
Qobo, M., & Nyathi, N. (2016). Ubuntu, Public Policy Ethics, and Tensions in South Africa’s Foreign Policy. South African Journal of International Affairs, 23(4), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2017.1298052
Ruggie, J. G. (2023). The Social Construction of The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP17-03, June, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786436405.00009
Saunders, N. (2018). Beyond Asylum Claims: Refugee Protest, Responsibility, and Article 28 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(7), 847–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2018.1485654
Siagian, R., Siahaan, L., & Hamzah, M. I. (2023). Human Rights in The Digital Era: Online Privacy, Freedom Of Speech, and Personal Data Protection. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 2(4), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v2i4.149
Tapsell, R. (2017). Media Power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, Citizens, and the Digital Revolution. Rowman & Littlefield .
WHO. (2017). Transformative Accountability for Adolescents: Accountability for The Health and Human Rights of Women, Children and Adolescents in The 2030 Agenda. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.